Hey Hollywood! You’re doing it wrong (Vertical Cover)


This is a great example of a “Holywood” use of cover. Looks dramatic and it is great for movies, but bad for personal defense.

I blame Hollywood for the general populations inability to use vertical cover. It is the most basic of the tactical skills, it is used multiple times in every IDPA match and it is the easiest to practice as you walk around, yet is among the most often made errors.

The reasons Hollywood uses cover wrong are obvious…  If you paid an actor $20,000,000 to be in your film, would you hide him behind a wall? It would be really hard to follow the dialog from 2 good guys that are pinned down if you couldn’t see them and the gun looks a lot bigger it you thrust it into the camera.

Tactically however this is not good.

In the photo to the left you can see me using bad Hollywood form around both left and right side cover.  In both example’s I am using a poor grip (teacup) which does nothing for recoil control and helps bind me up.  I am sticking the gun out past the edge of the wall, exposing it to someone who might be around the corner, exposing where I am and binding me up, limiting my range of motion.  The result is that I have to expose much of my body and I would be far less effective.2012_vert_cover_good

While much less dramatic, the image to the right shows much better form.

In each position, I amusing a proper 2 handed grip, I am back away from the edge of the door (protecting my muzzle from a grab), I have free range of motion and I have minimized the visible area of my body.  None of upper or lower body and only my out side arm and enough of my head to allow use of my dominant eye is exposed.

_ _ _ _ _

The catalyst for this post was a forum comment suggesting that one reason for practicing weak-hand only shooting is to permit shooting around vertical cover. Tomorrow I will post some images that show why this is an important skill with a rifle (they also show why I don’t like a rifle for home defense), but the short version is that with a rifle tucked into the pocket of your shoulder you need to expose your far shoulder to the target to place a shot on target.  With a pistol you only need to expose the eye you are sighting with and when leaning this can be a difference of 8-12″. 

The pistol corollary to switching hands would be to close your dominant eye.

If you are unsure what is your dominant eye… check out this post on determining your dominant eye.

_ _ _ _ _

This positioning is made possible by standing back away from the edge of your cover and it is the reason you hear people say “Don’t crowd your cover.”

This is a skill I practice everyday!  I practice it with my son when we have Nerf gun wars (He practices it too) but I also mentally practice it whenever I walk around I corner.

I do my best to never cut the corner. I approach it from a fairly wide position, lean slightly to look at what is coming (like crossing the street) and then scan the rest of the room as it becomes available.

Try it for a day, it quickly becomes habit!

If you want to see more of the pictures my son and I took in preparation for this post, including a few of him with a Nerf over-under, check out the gallery on the Facebook page.

Ron is the Founder and President of When the Balloon Goes Up! He competes regularly in IDPA as an ESP/Expert, his focus is on concealed carry, home defense and analyzing equipment to find “Gear that Just Works!”

Tagged with: , ,
  • Robert

    To be fair, there’s no cover at all inside your typical house, only non-bullet stopping concealment. ;)

  • http://balloongoesup.com Ron Larimer

    Yeah maybe… but I think I would have some unwanted attention if I used the concrete corner of the concession stand at the local park. ;)

    I actually mentioned that the 1st time I touched this topic, but I also included pictures that show what is actually behind that corner and if I’m going to take a bullet, I think I want it to go through as mass as possible 1st. If I can keep it from expanding because it has filled up with something, that is good too.

  • http://bandatacfit.wordpress.com bandatacfit

    Great photos!

  • http://gravatar.com/glock85713 Phil Wong

    Fine technical point: When shooting from left barricade as a right-eye-dominant shooter(or vice-versa), you don’t really *need* to either close your dominant eye, or lean out further to expose your dominant eye – if you keep both eyes open, and only lean-out far enough to expose your non-dominant eye, the barricade cover itself will mask your dominant eye like a competitive bullseye shooter’s eye shield, thus removing the confusing “double-image” sight picture some people experience, without the liabilities of closing one eye(muscular exertion, sympathetic distortion of the vision in the open eye, loss of peripheral vision) or exposing both eyes(more head protruding beyond cover)…

  • http://www.facebook.com/redbear762 Chris Watson

    I’d argue, given the construction of modern homes, that this is more concealment than cover.
    Just sayin’…

  • Lieutenant G. Smith

    To be fair, Hollywood is chock full of tactical errors. Good guys routinely stand in the open or move through a flat open area in a hail of bullets which never seem to hit them no matter how carefully aimed they are. They also hide behind milk crates, lobster traps, rose bushes and rusty metal drums that can be shot through with a pellet gun, yet all seem to stop incoming bullets. Good guys with pistols routinely outshoot bad guys with rifles AT rifle distances. The list goes on and on. Reality is never, ever use a tactic you see in the movies

  • Ted Blackwell

    Hollywood is so full of it. Another example: Subgun, usually an Uzi, operated with the stock folded when there was ample time to deploy it. And a never-run-out magazine.

  • http://gravatar.com/n4aof n4aof

    Perhaps the next article will be on the difference between cover and concealment — THEN perhaps we could have another article about the use of cover with illustrations that actually have some cover in them!?!?!

    If the bad guys have anything better than a .22Short, there isn’t ANY cover being used in any of the pictures with this article.

    With any of my carry pistols, I could easily put rounds in the center of Ron’s chest in any of the pictures with this article because interior walls are NOT cover! More importantly, most BGs don’t know anything about cover but have been trained by hollywood to shoot at people using cover anyway — and in this case the BG would accidentally discover that hollywood gets it wrong when bullets bounce off or get stoped by drywall.

    There isn’t much cover in the typical home today, but you can create good cover easily enough if you think ahead. One of the best sources of decent cover is a well filled bookcase – it won’t last too long in a firefight, but it is good cover (especially against pistol rounds) while it lasts.

    Even if those walls were cover instead of just concealment, why is Ron standing up instead of kneeling or at least crouching??

    • http://balloongoesup.com Ron Larimer

      I have done cover vs concealment before (and actually showed the inside of that wall), however I would be interested to know how you would use cover differently from concealment.

      As for kneeling… the catalyst for the post was debunking the idea that you needed to shoot with your weak hand around weakside cover. The elevation you choose to shoot from is irrelevant for that point. Further more if I was kneeling I wouldn’t have a view over the couch islands in the kitchen.

      Furthermore tactically in my house I would be coming around that corner to progress through to my kids room. I would prefer to stay on my feet.

  • BambiB

    One advantage of using a rifle over a handgun is that you don’t have to expose anything… Just shoot through the wall!

  • E. Zach Lee-Wright

    As for stupid Hollywood moments, tops for me was a scene in CSI where two C.S.I. dudes walked up to a bank window which had recently acquired a few bullet holes. One dude said “looks like a nine to me”. As if there were not at least eight other cartridges which make exactly the same size hole.

    • http://balloongoesup.com Ron Larimer

      That one isn’t so bad to me.

      Sure it could be a 9×23, but in the US 9mm is the most common (cheap and readily available).

      Also while we call a 9mm Luger a “9″ that only refers to the diameter. Just like .300 Blackout, 30-30, .308 and 300wsm are all 30cals.

  • SteveA

    Or a .380, 38 special, 357 mag, 357 sig, 9×18. All of which range from extremely common to common rds.
    It was a stupid comment on a show that has repeated gotten dumber about guns as the yrs have passed

Lone Wolf Conversion Barrels Available Now!

MTAC Holsters Staff Pick!

Advertisements